You can read the full statement entering here. This is a fragment of the statement that the firm has sent to XDA Developers. In any case, the specialists considered it a misrepresentation of user experience. In principle, it was unknown if the limitations that the Chinese manufacturer applies to certain popular apps were related to preserving battery life, which was finally confirmed. If they detect them, they will suffer the same fate as the OnePlus 9 and OnePlus 9 Pro. īut that’s not all, since Geekbench will also analyze the performance of other smartphones from the same company in search of irregularities. We’ve delisted the OnePlus 9 and OnePlus 9 Pro from our Android Benchmark chart. We view this as a form of benchmark manipulation. That’s probably wishful thinking, though.It’s disappointing to see OnePlus handsets making performance decisions based on application identifiers rather than application behavior. Perhaps companies should start putting the resources necessary to devise unscrupulous benchmark cheating tools into actually improving their products, to prevent unethical situations like this one from happening again, and provide better products to consumers. It’s not the first time something like this has been uncovered, and likely won’t be the last. In some cases, it has also resulted in lawsuits and millions of dollars in fines or settlements. Suspiciously, however, the device still put up questionable benchmarks scores – so the mechanism for detecting the benchmark apps may have simply been moved to another location or hidden.Įvery time a situation like this has cropped up, the offending company destroys its reputation and erodes consumer trust. Oppo pushed a firmware update to a Reno3 Pro being used for testing, and the benchmark listings disappeared from their original locations in the whitelist. In a particularly damning turn of events, over the course of its investigation, AnandTech also appears to have uncovered attempts to hide the whitelisting, but not actually disable it. It requires significant resources and time too, which is why we must draw attention to these situations when they occur, so the wider community can verify the findings and potentially uncover other potential wrong-doers. Not only do you require the actual devices to test, but customized versions of the benchmark, not distributed through public app stores, are needed as well. While I don’t doubt there are other devices that behave similarly, uncovering issues like this is exceedingly difficult. In its blog post responding to the article defending its position and practices, MediaTek also states, “As we mentioned above, we follow accepted industry benchmarking standards and are confident that the capabilities of our chipsets are being accurately represented in benchmark tests.” And then MediaTek goes on to claim that one of its competitors is doing similar things with its chipsets, but doesn’t go so far as to name the competitor. The fact is, benchmark scores are extremely important for some audiences, and occasionally vendors will push the ethical envelope to paint their products in the best light possible in an attempt to win over those audiences. This reveals what the upper end of performance capabilities are on any given chipset.” The statement goes on to explain that device performance will vary based on regional market requirements, but there is no clear and justifiable explanation. Many companies design devices to run on the highest possible performance levels when benchmarking tests are running in order to show the full capabilities of the chipset. We work closely with global device makers when it comes to testing and benchmarking devices powered by our chipsets, but ultimately brands have the flexibility to configure their own devices as they see fit. MediaTek’s response said, “MediaTek follows accepted industry standards and is confident that benchmarking tests accurately represent the capabilities of our chipsets. MediaTek has since responded to the allegations.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |